![]() ![]() ![]() Those of you experienced in sim racing will undoubtedly know that physics can be a little controversial, especially in games where there are so many settings that can be tweaked to find a much-improved setup.įorce Feedback (FFB) is typically the main complaint with Project CARS 2 when comparing the games. Because of that, there’s no clear-cut answer to which game is ‘better’ since they have their unique appeal.įor that reason, it’s time to head to the start line as we put these sim-racers head-to-head!Īssetto Corsa vs Project CARS 2 - Physics Luckily for you, we’ve invested a shameful number of hours of seat time in both games.Īfter several years of enjoying what they both have to offer, we’ve built up a fairly substantial list of considerations to help you decide which game is likely to be best suited for your individual preferences.Īlthough they’re both targeting a similar sim racing crowd, their approach has been somewhat different. It’s not until you begin throwing some significant hours into both games that you begin to unravel the true positives and negatives that either game has to offer from your perspective. ![]() Meanwhile, Gamespot wasn’t quite as blown away - instead opting for 7/10.īut, let’s face it the early critics’ reviews aren’t the deciding factor. When Slightly Mad studios released the first Project CARS game in 2015, it received a mixed response from gamers and critics alike, and very few felt that it matched the standard set by Assetto Corsa, which had been on the market since 2013.Īfter listening to the feedback, they opted to head back to the drawing board, and in September 2017, they launched Project CARS 2, providing them with a second shot at beating Assetto Corsa’s efforts.Īs the reviews began rolling in, they picked up an “Amazing” 9.2 rating from IGN. But, which is best? We cover everything you need to know in this guide. "The use of twinkling artifact to help detect biopsy markers by ultrasound could impact breast radiologists in performing preoperative localization procedures after NST," the authors of this AJR article concluded, thus impacting breast surgeons in performing intraoperative localization.Whether you’re planning to drift or race, Assetto Corsa and Project CARS 2 are among the most popular sim racing games. Additionally, surface roughness was significantly higher for markers with than without actionable twinkling for the C1-6 (median values: 0.97 vs 0.35, p=.02) and 9L (1.75 vs. Ultimately, three breast biopsy markers-Cork, Q, and MRI (Flex)-exhibited actionable ultrasound twinkling for ≥2 transducers in cadaveric breast. Markers were then assigned twinkling scores from 0 (confident in no twinkling) to 4 (confident in exuberant twinkling) score ≥3 represented actionable twinkling. Lee and colleagues evaluated 35 commercial breast biopsy markers for twinkling artifact in various experimental conditions, including scanning medium (solid gel phantom, ultrasound coupling gel, cadaveric breast), transducer (ML6-15, 9L, C1-6), and embedding material (present vs. "Actionable twinkling was associated with higher marker surface roughness."ĭr. Lee, MD, Ph.D., from the department of radiology at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Noting that certain breast biopsy markers exhibited actionable twinkling (i.e., sufficient confidence to rely solely on twinkling for target localization) in cadaveric breast, "twinkling was observed with greater confidence for C1-6 and 9L than ML6-15 transducer," wrote first author Christine U. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |